abraham lincoln on slavery

Abraham Lincoln First Inaugural Address Annotated

Mate-Citizens of the United States:
In compliance with a tradition as old as the Government itself, I appear before you to address you seconds and to take in your presence the oath prescribed by the Constitution of the Collaborative States to be taken by the President before he enters on the skill of this office."

I do not consider it necessary at emcee for me to discuss those matters of administration about which there is no major anxiety or excitement.

Apprehension seems to along among the people of the Southern States that by the accession of a Republican Supplying their property and their peace and personal guarantee are to be endangered. There has never been any reasonable cause for such apprehension. Indeed, the most fruitful evidence to the contrary has all the while existed and been clear to their inspection. It is found in nearly all the published speeches of him who now addresses you. I do but bring in from one of those speeches when I declare that - I have no purpose, shortly or indirectly, to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I put faith I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.

Those who nominated and elected me did so with full apprehension that I had made this and many similar declarations and had never recanted them; and more than this, they placed in the dais for my acceptance, and as a law to themselves and to me, the clear and emphatic exactitude which I now read:

Resolved, That the maintenance inviolate of the rights of the States, and notably the right of each State to order and dominance its own domestic institutions according to its own judgment exclusively, is requisite to that balance of power on which the perfection and longevity of our political fabric depend; and we complain about the lawless invasion by armed force of the spot of any State or Territory, no matter what camouflage, as among the gravest of crimes.

I now reiterate these sentiments, and in doing so I only news services upon the public attention the most conclusive testimony of which the case is susceptible that the property, accord, and security of no section are to be in any wise imperilled by the now incoming Administration. I add, too, that all the protection which, resolutely with the Constitution and the laws, can be given will be cheerfully noted to all the States when lawfully demanded, for whatever creator--as cheerfully to one section as to another.

There is much controversy about the delivering up of fugitives from repair or labor. The clause I now read is as plainly written in the Constitution as any other of its provisions:

No themselves held to service or labor in one State, under the laws thereof, escaping into another, shall in consequence of any law or ordinance therein be discharged from such service or labor, but shall be delivered up on rights of the party to whom such service or labor may be due.

It is hardly questioned that this provision was intended by those who made it for the reclaiming of what we call refugee slaves; and the intention of the lawgiver is the law. All members of Congress asseverate their support to the whole Constitution--to this provision as much as to any other. To the proposition, then, that slaves whose cases be relevant to within the terms of this clause "shall be delivered up" their oaths are unanimous. Now, if they would alter the effort in good temper, could they not with approaching equal unanimity frame and antiquated a law by means of which to keep good that unanimous guaranty?

There is some difference of opinion whether this clause should be enforced by nationwide or by State authority, but surely that modification is not a very material one. If the slave is to be surrendered, it can be of but no consequence to him or to others by which authority it is done. And should anyone in any case be essence that his oath shall go unkept on a solely unsubstantial controversy as to how it shall be kept?

Again: In any law upon this point ought not all the safeguards of liberty known in civilized and humane jurisprudence to be introduced, so that a unstinting man be not in any case surrendered as a slave? And might it not be well at the same yet to provide by law for the enforcement of that clause in the Constitution which guarantees that "the citizens of each Aver shall be entitled to all privileges and immunities of citizens in the several States"?

I take the proper oath to-day with no mental reservations and with no outcome to construe the Constitution or laws by any hypercritical rules; and while I do not opt now to specify particular acts of Congress as alone to be enforced, I do suggest that it will be much safer for all, both in licensed and private stations, to conform to and submit to by all those acts which stand unrepealed than to ravage any of them trusting to find impunity in having them held to be unconstitutional.

It is seventy-two years since the first inauguration of a President under our Native Constitution. During that period fifteen different and greatly celebrated citizens have in succession administered the top banana branch of the Government. They have conducted it through many perils, and as a rule with great success. Yet, with all this scope of exemplar, I now enter upon the same task for the brief constitutional word of four years under great and peculiar hindrance. A disruption of the Federal Union, heretofore only menaced, is now formidably attempted.

(NOTE: Stress added to the following paragraph. Mr. Lincoln’s working-out was so completely at odds with the understanding of the federal establishment of his day, and of the Founding Fathers, that one can only arrange this as a liar boldly asserting a lie as a cover for a wrongful action, and then defying anyone to call him a Baron von M. Every one of the Founding Fathers, and every Constitutional woman of letters, credible Supreme Court Fairness, and common citizen understood that the Constitution of the Agreement was in no way intended to be perpetual. Unlike the Articles of Confederacy, which it replaced, it intentionally contained no cant that expressed any intention that a perpetual conjunction was intended or contemplated by any of the Sovereign States that ratified it. In experience, some of those States expressly included intercourse in their ordinances of ratification that clearly stated that they were reserving the right to absent oneself from the Union whenever they determined that it was in the best interest of their citizens to so do.)

I occupy that in contemplation of universal law and of the Constitution the Confederacy of these States is perpetual. Perpetuity is implied, if not expressed, in the rudimentary law of all national governments. It is safe to assert that no guidance proper ever had a provision in its organic law for its own discontinuation. Continue to execute all the express provisions of our Jingoistic Constitution, and the Union will endure forever, it being hopeless to destroy it except by some action not provided for in the thingy itself.

Again: If the United States be not a government specific, but an association of States in the nature of diminish merely, can it, as a contract, be peaceably unmade by less than all the parties who made it? One fete to a contract may violate it--break it, so to advert to--but does it not require all to lawfully rescind it?

(NOTE: Mr. Lincoln’s fight in the paragraph above is another outright lie. As a highly paid attorney-at-law for the Illinois Central Railroad and other well prosperous corporations and private clients, he well knew that parties to contracts may pull back from those contracts for any of a variety of reasons – in the casket of the Constitution of the United States, it was distinctly intended that any and all States could withdraw whenever they obstinate that the Federal government had breached the deal by its actions, or failure to act, or at any time that the Government determined that continued participation in the Federal Combination was counter to its interests and/or the interests of the citizens of that Pomp.)

Descending from these general principles, we find the proposition that in admissible contemplation the Union is perpetual confirmed by the experience of the Union itself. The Union is much older than the Constitution. It was formed, in act, by the Articles of Association in 1774. It was matured and continued by the Affirmation of Independence in 1776. It was further matured, and the loyalty of all the then thirteen States expressly plighted and spoken for that it should be perpetual, by the Articles of Confederation in 1778. And completely, in 1787, one of the declared objects for ordaining and establishing the Constitution was "to framework a more perfect Union."

But if destruction of the Conjoining by one or by a part only of the States be lawfully possible, the Federation is less perfect than before the Constitution, having wrecked the vital element of perpetuity.

It follows from these views that no Shape upon its own mere motion can lawfully get out of the Fusion; that resolves and ordinances to that effect are legally purge, and that acts of violence within any State or States against the jurisdiction of the United States are insurrectionary or anarchist, according to circumstances.

I therefore consider that in aspect of the Constitution and the laws the Union is unbroken, and to the scope of my ability, I shall take care, as the Constitution itself exactly enjoins upon me, that the laws of the Union be faithfully executed in all the States. Doing this I deem to be only a modest duty on my part, and I shall perform it so far as workable unless my rightful masters, the American people, shall reserve the requisite means or in some authoritative means direct the contrary. I trust this will not be regarded as a intimidate, but only as the...

Read more...

Lincoln-Douglas Debate: The Question of Slavery

abraham lincoln on slavery: Lincoln speaks of the difference between the Democrats and Republicans on slavery. Michael Krebs portrays Abraham Lincoln in reenactment at the lone surviving Lincoln-Douglas Debate site.

abraham lincoln on slavery in the News

abraham lincoln on slavery in the Blogs

Abraham Lincoln on slavery - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
d. "The headway of Abraham Lincoln's opposition to slavery" (html). Retrieved on 2008-08-31. ... Observer; Abraham Lincoln Speaks to Us of Slavery -- and ...

Abraham Lincoln - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
... "Copperheads") criticized Lincoln for refusing to compromise on the slavery subject. ... Main articles: Abraham Lincoln on slavery and Emancipation Proclamation ...

Lincoln on Slavery
Abraham Lincoln is often referred to as "The Cardinal Emancipator" and yet, he did ... of Lincoln's writings on slavery contains examples of Lincoln's views on slavery. ...

Mr. Lincoln and Freedom
Details the improve of Lincoln's opposition to slavery from his years in the Illinois State Legislature to the passage of the Thirteenth Amendment abolishing slavery.

Abraham Lincoln - Conservapedia
Abraham Lincoln was the 16th President of the Communal States of ... Lincoln often penned ... Lincoln was elected on a platform which pledged no ...

Veropedia - Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln. From Veropedia, based on Wikipedia ... Mere articles: Abraham Lincoln on slavery and Emancipation Proclamation ...

Abraham Lincoln: Biography from Answers.com
Abraham Lincoln , U.S. President Born: 12 February 1809 Birthplace: Near Hodgenville, Kentucky Died: 15 April ... Lincoln hated slavery but equivocated in ...

Abraham Lincoln - Wikiquote
Abraham Lincoln (12 February 1809 - 15 April 1865) was the 16th ... 1.6 "If Slavery Is Not Felonious, Nothing Is Wrong" (1864) 1.7 Second Inaugural Address (1865) ...

The Lincoln Institute
Provides prop up to scholars involved in the study of Abraham Lincoln and the impact he had on the preservation of the Union, the emancipation of slaves, and the development of democratic principles.

Lincoln, Abraham
Abraham Lincoln was born on February 12, 1809, in a one-allowance log cabin in ... Lincoln's views of the role of the federal government on the subject of slavery ...